fbpx Effectiveness in Scotland | Page 47 | Scienza in rete

Effectiveness in Scotland

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Dossier: 
H1N1 vaccine

prossimo articolo

Malvaldi e la statistica del ragionevole dubbio

dadi e lente di ingrandimento

Che cosa hanno in comune Edgar Allan Poe, O.J. Simpson e gli errori giudiziari? La risposta passa per la statistica, ma soprattutto per il modo in cui ragioniamo. In “Se fossi stato al vostro posto” (Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2025) Marco Malvaldi parte da un celebre caso di cronaca ottocentesca e dalla sua trasfigurazione letteraria per mostrare come, quando siamo chiamati a interpretare i fatti, numeri, probabilità, narrazione e fallacie cognitive si intreccino. Un saggio e insieme un manuale, ricco di casi (reali o inventati) ma anche di ironia, che infine diventa un appello a chi, di fronte all’incertezza delle prove, ha la responsabilità di decidere della colpevolezza o dell’innocenza di qualcuno

Questa è una recensione che esce con colpevolissimo ritardo. In effetti, appena in anticipo sul primo compleanno del libro. Per fortuna, i libri non hanno una data di scadenza (almeno nella maggior parte dei casi). Di certo non ce l’ha Se fossi stato al vostro posto (Raffaello Cortina Editore, 2025), in cui Marco Malvaldi parla di qualcosa decisamente a lunga conservazione: la statistica e la narrazione.