The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.
Effectiveness in Scotland
Primary tabs
prossimo articolo
Cambiamenti climatici: l'adattamento non ostacoli la prevenzione

La retorica dell'adattamento rischia di far coincidere il controllo degli effetti del cambiamento climatico con l'intervento sulle sue cause. La sanità pubblica insegna che protezione e mitigazione non sono strategie alternative: senza la prevenzione primaria, ogni altra misura di tutela resta una rincorsa a un rischio destinato a crescere.
Sylvain Pedneault, CC BY-SA 3.0 <https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0>, via Wikimedia Commons
Dopo l'intervento su Scienza in rete dedicato ad argomentare che quello che oggi viene spesso definito “adattamento” ai cambiamenti climatici non coincide con l'adattamento biologico della specie umana, ma piuttosto in strategie tecnologiche, urbanistiche e organizzative finalizzate a migliorare la convivenza con un ambiente sempre più ostile, ritengo utile compiere un ulteriore passo sul terreno della sanità pubblica.