fbpx Reform oversight of Italy’s science funds | Page 13 | Scienza in rete

Reform oversight of Italy’s science funds

Read time: 2 mins

We wish to highlight the stark contrast between the hardship in Italy’s publicly funded research community (see G. Parisi Nature 530, 33; 2016) and the reportedly largely unused sums of money allocated to a single research institute over the past 12 years. After 3 years without any financial provision for bottom-up research, Italy’s government is providing €31 million (US$36 million) a year for the next 3 years to cover research in the humanities as well as science. Of this year’s 4,431 grant applications for this modest sum, just 300–500 will be successful. By contrast, the government plans to inject €150 million a year for the next 10 years into the Human Technopole project, which will focus on genomics, big data, ageing and nutrition. 

The recipient is the Italian Institute of Technology in Genoa, which is self-governing and so not publicly accountable — despite the large sums of public money involved. A recent report indicates that half of the institute’s funds remained unspent in 2010–14 (see go.nature.com/ vouywf; in Italian). The government should establish an adequately funded agency that has transparent jurisdiction over the funding and execution of research. The agency would also monitor the progress of the Human Technopole and oversee its accountability. (See also go.nature.com/hgfplj.)

Ernesto Carafoli* Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, Padua, Italy. Cesare Montecucco* University of Padua, Italy. [email protected] *Supported by 13 signatories (see go.nature.com/3xxovu for full list).

Lettera pubblicata su Nature 11 maggio 2016

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Human Technopole

prossimo articolo

Thomas Morgan, quando il gene diventa misurabile

elaborazione grafica con foto di Thomas Morgan e Drosophila

Con le ricerche di Thomas Morgan, all’inizio del Novecento, il gene cessa di essere un’entità teorica e diventa una realtà sperimentale: localizzato sui cromosomi, ordinabile in mappe, soggetto a ricombinazione e mutazione. La pubblicazione del suo "The Theory of the Gene" (1926) ha sancito la nascita della genetica causale e quantitativa, che collega ereditarietà, evoluzione e citologia e apre la strada alla genomica e alla medicina genetica.

La genetica causale nasceva cent'anni fa, quando Thomas Hunt Morgan (1866-1945) tirava le somme di oltre venti anni di studi sperimentali su Drosophila melanogaster. Pubblicato a febbraio, The Theory of the Gene (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1926) fu uno spartiacque nella storia della biologia. “Teoria”, non il concetto del gene, che c’era già almeno come unità di trasmissione, né “che cosa è un gene?”, che non si sa nemmeno oggi.