fbpx Reform oversight of Italy’s science funds | Scienza in rete

Reform oversight of Italy’s science funds

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

We wish to highlight the stark contrast between the hardship in Italy’s publicly funded research community (see G. Parisi Nature 530, 33; 2016) and the reportedly largely unused sums of money allocated to a single research institute over the past 12 years. After 3 years without any financial provision for bottom-up research, Italy’s government is providing €31 million (US$36 million) a year for the next 3 years to cover research in the humanities as well as science. Of this year’s 4,431 grant applications for this modest sum, just 300–500 will be successful. By contrast, the government plans to inject €150 million a year for the next 10 years into the Human Technopole project, which will focus on genomics, big data, ageing and nutrition. 

The recipient is the Italian Institute of Technology in Genoa, which is self-governing and so not publicly accountable — despite the large sums of public money involved. A recent report indicates that half of the institute’s funds remained unspent in 2010–14 (see go.nature.com/ vouywf; in Italian). The government should establish an adequately funded agency that has transparent jurisdiction over the funding and execution of research. The agency would also monitor the progress of the Human Technopole and oversee its accountability. (See also go.nature.com/hgfplj.)

Ernesto Carafoli* Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, Padua, Italy. Cesare Montecucco* University of Padua, Italy. [email protected] *Supported by 13 signatories (see go.nature.com/3xxovu for full list).

Lettera pubblicata su Nature 11 maggio 2016

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Human Technopole

prossimo articolo

Il Piano nazionale di adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici (PNACC): un'analisi giuridica e scientifica

Il 20 febbraio scorso è stato pubblicato il Piano nazionale di adattamento ai cambiamenti climatici (PNACC). In considerazione dell’importanza del documento e della rilevanza degli aspetti giuridici e scientifici coinvolti, la direzione della Rgaonline e la redazione di Scienza in rete, due riviste che, nei diversi settori del diritto e dell’informazione scientifica, da tempo collaborano condividendo articoli, contributi e riflessioni in materia di ambiente, hanno deciso di organizzare un esame congiunto del Piano.