The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.
Effectiveness in Scotland
Primary tabs
prossimo articolo
Nuove linee guida alimentari USA: tra “cibo vero” e messaggi contraddittori

Se da un lato i richiami a consumare meno zuccheri e più cibi freschi possono essere considerati aspetti positivi delle nuove linee guida alimentari degli USA, altri aspetti scientifici e comunicativi sono davvero fuorvianti e pericolosi, come hanno notato diverse fonti accreditate come la Società Italiana di Nutrizione Umana e l'Università di Harvard. Stiamo parlando in particolare della piramide rovesciata, l'invito a dosi eccessive di proteine e l'assenza di considerazioni ambientali e socioeconomiche.
Il 7 gennaio 2026 il Dipartimento della Salute (HHS) e quello dell’Agricoltura (USDA) statunitensi hanno pubblicato la nuova edizione delle Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) 2025–2030 (https://www.dietaryguidelines.gov), presentandole come un “reset” della politica nutrizionale federale, con uno slogan semplice: “eat real food” (“mangia cibo vero”).