fbpx Effectiveness in Scotland | Page 159 | Scienza in rete

Effectiveness in Scotland

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Dossier: 
H1N1 vaccine

prossimo articolo

Niente panico! Siamo a scuola

megafono su sfondo scuro con la scritta do not panic

Il tema della salute mentale dei giovani è al centro del dibattito pubblico, ma insieme all’attenzione cresce anche il timore di approcci inutilmente medicalizzanti. La promozione della salute, volta piuttosto a rafforzare le risorse individuali e intervenire anche sui contesti che creano disagio, potrebbe essere di maggiore aiuto. L’esperienza di Panikit, un kit di pacificazione con gli attacchi di panico appare un modello promettente.
 

Negli ultimi anni, la salute mentale dei giovani è al centro del dibattito pubblico e oggetto di numerose iniziative. Tuttavia, nonostante gli sforzi e le buone intenzioni, i risultati non sempre appaiono incoraggianti: molti studenti vivono a scuola condizioni di ansia e attacchi di panico, talvolta inabilitanti. Quando il confine tra ciò che consideriamo sofferenza, disturbo, malattia si allarga, può crescere la tendenza a medicalizzare problemi che hanno anche radici sociali, relazionali e contestuali.