fbpx Effectiveness in Scotland | Page 4 | Scienza in rete

Effectiveness in Scotland

Read time: 2 mins

The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
H1N1 vaccine

prossimo articolo

La medicina afflitta da rigidità cognitiva

Immagine di Seveso nel 1976

Cinquant’anni fa nasceva Medicina democratica, movimento che metteva in discussione i ruoli di potere insiti nell’esercizio medico. Vent’anni più tardi l’EBM demoliva la discrezionalità clinica, oggi la sfida è riuscire a ragionare fuori dai protocolli, quando serve.

Nei giorni 15 e 16 maggio di cinquant’anni fa, a Bologna, si tenne il primo congresso nazionale di “Medicina democratica”, atto fondativo del movimento creato da Giulio Alfredo Maccacaro. Al centro dell’azione culturale e politica c’era il tema dei rapporti tra medicina e potere, oggetto di discussione nel mondo politico e tra gli intellettuali della sinistra occidentale da oltre un decennio.