fbpx Effectiveness in Scotland | Page 33 | Scienza in rete

Effectiveness in Scotland

Primary tabs

Read time: 2 mins

The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.

Autori: 
Sezioni: 
Dossier: 
H1N1 vaccine

prossimo articolo

Meningioma e contraccettivi: il rischio dei titoli sul rischio

contraccettivi

Un aggiornamento di farmacovigilanza su due progestinici, desogestrel ed etonogestrel, associati a un piccolo aumento del rischio di meningioma, è diventato sui giornali un titolo allarmante sul «rischio di tumore al cervello». Il caso mostra quanto la sintesi giornalistica possa distorcere un dato di per sé rassicurante (la farmacovigilanza funziona) e perché comunicare bene il rischio conti quanto misurarlo correttamente.

Reproductive Health Supplies Coalition - Unsplash

Lo scorso 6 agosto, il quotidiano Open ha pubblicato un articolo dal titolo decisamente allarmante: «Contraccettivi, scatta l’allerta Aifa: rischio di tumore al cervello». È il genere di lancio acchiappa-click che può trasformare un aggiornamento di farmacovigilanza in una tempesta mediatica, con il pericolo di alimentare paure sproporzionate rispetto alle evidenze scientifiche e allontanare tante donne da una contraccezione sicura. Esperienze già fatte in passato.