The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.
Effectiveness in Scotland
Primary tabs
prossimo articolo
I social network sul banco degli imputati

I social network possono essere paragonati alle sigarette per la loro capacità di indurre sofferenze e dipendenza in chi, soprattutto tra le persone più giovani ne fa un uso incontrollato? Su queste basi ha preso il via il primo di una serie di processi intentati alle grandi aziende tecnologiche. Sul modello di quelli che misero sotto accusa le aziende del tabacco.
Crediti immagine: Robin Worrall/Unsplash
Il 28 gennaio scorso ha preso il via il primo di una serie di processi contro i colossi dei social network, accusati di aver progettato piattaforme finalizzate a creare dipendenza, specie nei più giovani. L’impostazione del processo richiama quello contro le industrie del tabacco, avvenuto negli anni 90, sia nelle strategie dell’accusa che nell’oggetto imputato: i social sono come le sigarette? Le aziende sapevano dei danni delle loro piattaforme sulla salute mentale?