The effectiveness of the pandemic H1N1 influenza vaccination program, introduced in Scotland in October 2009, has been assessed by a team of researchers from different Scottish and French institutions, coordinated by Dr. Colin Simpson, from the University of Edinburgh. The results of this assessment has been published in the June issue of Lancet.
The vaccination campaign consisted of two phases, the first being aimed at frontline health-care workers, pregnant women and people whose underlying health problems make them more sensitive to influenza-like illness; in the second phase, all children aged between 6 months and 5 years were targeted.
The researchers performed a retrospective study by linking primary care, hospital records and death certification datasets of 247178 persons, representing the 5% of Scottish population. Of them, 38296 (15.5%) were given the vaccination. In this nationally representative cohort there were fewer hospital admissions and deaths from influenza-like illness – influenza, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cardiac disorders – in patients who were vaccinated against H1N1 influenza A virus. A representative sub-group of patient was swabbed and tested with RT-PCR, revealing an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 77%. Such a result proved to be higher than recent estimates in case-control studies undertaken in the UK (72%) and Europe (71.9%) but lower than another one performed in Navarre, Spain (89%).
The study thus provided evidence that the Scottish H1N1 vaccination program have been effective, both in terms of protection against the virus and reduction of mortality from influenza-like illness, and is likely to have reduced the burden of pandemic influenza on health-care providers.
Effectiveness in Scotland
prossimo articolo
Gli Stati Uniti si sfilano dalle agenzie di cooperazione e ricerca globale

Mercoledì 7 gennaio Trump ha annunciato con un memorandum il ritiro degli Stati Uniti da 66 organizzazioni internazionali, incluse le principali piattaforme di cooperazione scientifica sul clima, biodiversità, migrazione e salute globale. Il Segretario di Stato Marco Rubio ha dichiarato che queste istituzioni sono «ridondanti, mal gestite, inutili, dispendiose, monopolizzate da interessi con agende contrarie alle nostre». I danni del ritiro statunitense sono enormi perché minano alla radice il multilateralismo e la cooperazione scientifica internazionale.
Mercoledì 7 gennaio 2026, mentre il Congresso discuteva gli stanziamenti 2026 per le agenzie scientifiche federali (vedi articolo di Patrizia Caraveo), la Casa Bianca ha firmato un memorandum presidenziale che segna forse il punto di non ri