Compulsory vaccination and rates of coverage immunisation in Europe

Tempo di lettura: 2 mins

Article published on the ASSET website

High rates of vaccination coverage in childhood are main indicators for public health. However, reaching and maintaining such a target is not always an easy task for public health institutions, and the spread of vaccine refusal and hesitancy is making this even harder.

Enforcing mandatory vaccinations is one of the strategies that some countries adopted and others are considering in order to face this issue. Depending on local legislations, legal consequences for those who do not accept the uptake can be very different, ranging from pecuniary penalties to hurdles to attend public schools. In some cases, parents may even incur penal consequences, as it recently happened in France, were two parents refusing to vaccinate their children risked a jail sentence. Nevertheless, the efficacy of such an approach has been questioned.

ASSET performed an analysis on the issue, comparing coverage rates of immunisation against polio (Pol3), measles (MCV1) and pertussis containing vaccines (DTP3)* in European Union/European Economic Area (EU/EEA) countries, where, according to different policies, these vaccinations are either mandatory or recommended.

This comparison cannot confirm any relationship between mandatory vaccination and rates of childhood immunization in the EU/EEA countries.


* In some countries, such as Italy, vaccination against pertussis is highly recommended but not compulsory, while those against diphteria and tetanus on the contrary are, but the three are usually administered in one single shot.

altri articoli

Cosa c’entrano le alluvioni in Italia con l’emergenza climatica globale?

La scorsa settimana, in un convegno che ha visto riuniti i principali esperti italiani, è stata ricordata l'alluvione in Piemonte del 1994. Ma cosa c’entrano le alluvioni piemontesi con l’emergenza climatica? Simona Re ne parla con alcuni degli ospiti del convegno: Roberto Buizza (fisico e matematico, Istituto di Scienze della Vita della Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna di Pisa), Claudio Cassardo (meteorologo e fisico del clima, Università di Torino), Carlo Cacciamani (fisico e meteorologo, Responsabile Centro Funzionale Centrale del Dipartimento Protezione Civile Nazionale di Roma), e Fabio Luino (geologo, CNR – IRPI, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Ricerca per la Protezione Idrogeologica di Torino).
Crediti imagine: Dean Moriarty/Pixabay. Licenza: Pixabay License

Secondo il parere di undicimila scienziati, autori di una recente

  • 392 letture